Discussion:
Those "low clearance" signs are there for a reason...
(too old to reply)
Elmer
2011-07-12 14:21:48 UTC
Permalink
Someone could make a video like that in Boston. Best place would be at
the Charlesgate exit off of Storrow Drive; best time would be "moving
day" at the beginning of the fall college semester. An over-height
truck crash there is virtually guaranteed on that day each and every
year.

The steel I-beam to protect the bridge in the video itself is a good
idea that I've seen used at other bridges and tunnels. In
Massachusetts though, it is preferable for the vehicle to inflict as
much damage as possible on the structure, which may or may not ever be
repaired.

Elmer
http://11foot8.com/
--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictorplate"
NadCixelsyd
2011-07-13 13:16:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Elmer
Someone could make a video like that in Boston. Best place would be at
the Charlesgate exit off of Storrow Drive; best time would be "moving
day" at the beginning of the fall college semester. An over-height
truck crash there is virtually guaranteed on that day each and every
year.
The steel I-beam to protect the bridge in the video itself is a good
idea that I've seen used at other bridges and tunnels. In
Massachusetts though, it is preferable for the vehicle to inflict as
much damage as possible on the structure, which may or may not ever be
repaired.
Elmer
http://11foot8.com/
--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictorplate"
If it happens more than once a year, they should put up a thing about
50m before the bridge. This thing would drape a few chains about 50mm
(2") below the bridge height.
Elmer
2011-07-13 21:27:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by NadCixelsyd
Post by Elmer
Someone could make a video like that in Boston. Best place would be at
the Charlesgate exit off of Storrow Drive; best time would be "moving
day" at the beginning of the fall college semester. An over-height
truck crash there is virtually guaranteed on that day each and every
year.
The steel I-beam to protect the bridge in the video itself is a good
idea that I've seen used at other bridges and tunnels. In
Massachusetts though, it is preferable for the vehicle to inflict as
much damage as possible on the structure, which may or may not ever be
repaired.
Elmer
http://11foot8.com/
--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictorplate"
If it happens more than once a year, they should put up a thing about
50m before the bridge.  This thing would drape a few chains about 50mm
(2") below the bridge height.
There are actually rubber flaps, chains, and other "draped" physical
warning devices, in addition to some dysfunctional warning alarms here
and there, but over height vehicles either don't notice or seem to
think they don't apply to them. I think it really needs something on
the order of a steel I-beam to actually get their attention.

Elmer
H.B. Elkins
2011-07-14 00:56:47 UTC
Permalink
In article <f5d77f98-8ae0-445b-ad97-***@en1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Elmer says...
Post by Elmer
There are actually rubber flaps, chains, and other "draped" physical
warning devices, in addition to some dysfunctional warning alarms here
and there, but over height vehicles either don't notice or seem to
think they don't apply to them. I think it really needs something on
the order of a steel I-beam to actually get their attention.
http://www.millenniumhwy.net/June_2006_Day_1/June_2006_Day_1-Pages/Image232.html

At the exit ramp from I-24 eastbound to US 41/US 64/US 72 west of Chattanooga.
--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictorplate"
Loading...